Key result
Interrupted rivaroxaban and warfarin both resulted in zero primary thromboembolic or major bleeding events in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
No prospective, randomized study had compared warfarin and rivaroxaban for preventing thrombotic and bleeding events during the perioperative period of catheter ablation for AF in Japan.
Does interrupted rivaroxaban improve safety compared to interrupted warfarin in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=36)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does interrupted rivaroxaban improve safety compared to interrupted warfarin in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, interrupted rivaroxaban may be safer than warfarin regarding minor bleeding, with no significant difference in silent cerebral lesions.
Supports safe periprocedural interruption of either agent; reinforces RCT evidence for anticoagulation in AF ablation.
No prospective, randomized study has been conducted to date in Japan comparing the use of warfarin and rivaroxaban for preventing thrombotic and bleeding events in the perioperative period of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This was a prospective, open-label randomized study assessing the safety and efficacy of warfarin and rivaroxaban in the perioperative period of CA for AF. Thrombotic events including silent cerebral lesion (SCL) detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bleeding events, and coagulation test results were assessed in correlation with interrupted warfarin or rivaroxaban in the perioperative period of CA for AF. Finally, thirty-six patients (18 men; aged 65±9.4 years) who underwent CA for AF were prospectively enrolled. No instance of symptomatic cerebral infarction occurred, but 12 of 36 patients (33.3%) showed new SCLs during the postprocedural cerebral MRI examination (8/21 in the rivaroxaban group and 4/15 in the warfarin group; P=0.47). The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the rivaroxaban group than in the warfarin group (6 vs. 8 days; P=0.0135). The incidence of minor bleeding was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group than in the warfarin group (0% vs. 26.6%; P=0.078). D-dimer concentration was significantly higher in the SCL group than in the no-SCL group (P=0.024) under warfarin, while the values of protein S (P=0.017) and prothrombin time (P=0.018) were significantly lower in the SCL group than in the no-SCL group under rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban usage in CA is safer than warfarin usage with respect to the incidence of minor bleeding. In patients receiving rivaroxaban therapy, a lower protein S level may be correlated with the incidence of SCL in CA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Atrial Fibrillation (n=36). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Composite of cerebral infarction, systemic embolization, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding events. Interrupted rivaroxaban and warfarin both resulted in zero primary thromboembolic or major bleeding events in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: