In this letter, we investigate the performance of constant-power waterfilling algorithms for the intersymbol interference channel and for the independent identically distributed fading channel where a constant power level is used across a properly chosen subset of subchannels. A rigorous performance analysis that upper bounds the maximum difference between the achievable rate under constant-power waterfilling and that under true waterfilling is given. In particular, it is shown that for the Rayleigh fading channel, the spectral efficiency loss due to constant-power waterfilling is at most 0.266 b/s/Hz. Furthermore, the performance bound allows a very-low-complexity, logarithm-free, power-adaptation algorithm to be developed. Theoretical worst-case analysis and simulation show that the approximate waterfilling scheme is very close to the optimum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: