Key result
Italian Cardiac Distress Inventory identifies severe psychological distress with ~84% discriminative accuracy.
Why the study?
The Cardiac Distress Inventory assesses cardiac distress following acute cardiac events, but an Italian version was lacking.
Cross-Sectional (n=293)
Yes
Effect estimate: AUC 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.90)
The Italian version of the Cardiac Distress Inventory is a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychological distress in patients with recent cardiac events.
Supports Italian CDI screening for post-event distress; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation and outcome trials.
Background: Acute cardiac events trigger multifaceted psychological responses captured by the construct of cardiac distress, a persistent negative emotional state involving multiple psychosocial domains. The Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) assesses this construct, but no Italian version exists. This study aimed to translate the CDI and assess its psychometric properties. Methods: After translation and back-translation, face validity was assessed with five patients and content validity with healthcare professionals. The CDI was administered to 293 patients who experienced a recent cardiac event from two Italian centers. Missing data were handled with multiple imputations. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA; principal axis factoring, oblimin rotation) assessed factorial structure. Criterion validity was assessed using correlations with Emotion Thermometers, Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and Kessler-6 (K6); ROC analysis assessed discriminative accuracy and the optimal cut-off. Results: The questionnaire demonstrated good face validity and suboptimal content validity (CVI-S/Ave = 0.72). EFA revealed a five-factor structure explaining 54% of the variance: “Role Change and Adaptation to Disease”, “Emotional Overwhelm, “Cognitive Challenges”, “Social Disconnection”, and “Health System Challenges”. The final 46-item version showed good internal consistency (ω = 0.857–0.926) and discriminative accuracy (AUC = 0.84), with an optimal cut-off of 36 (sensitivity 71%, specificity 84%). Conclusions: The current study provides preliminary evidence for the validity of the Italian CDI. Additional studies are needed to confirm the proposed structures and clinical cut-offs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gigante et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Recent cardiac events (n=293). Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) was evaluated on Discriminative accuracy for severe psychological distress (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.90). The 46-item Italian version of the Cardiac Distress Inventory demonstrated good internal consistency and discriminative accuracy (AUC 0.84) for identifying severe psychological distress.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: