Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational and experimental study demonstrates accurate aerodynamic drag prediction for irregular particles using sphere-filling machine learning, indicating improved gas-solid flow modeling.
Accurate prediction of aerodynamic drag on irregular particles is essential for modelling gas–solid transport and particle-handling processes. Conventional drag correlations rely on simplified shape descriptors and often perform poorly for angular particles with orientation-dependent flow behaviour. This study develops a geometry-aware machine-learning framework using sphere-filling reconstruction. Three-dimensional particle geometries were obtained by 3D scanning and parameterised using a maximum-inscribed-sphere method. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) database of 2,000 cases was established for airflow velocities of 20–100 m/s. Wind-tunnel force measurements and particle image velocimetry experiments validated the numerical model, showing an average CFD–experiment deviation of approximately 9.8 %. Five machine-learning models—support vector regression, random forest, a backpropagation neural network, Gaussian process regression, and least-squares boosting—were evaluated. Accuracy improved as the number of filling spheres increased from 10 to 30, confirming the importance of geometric resolution. Least-squares boosting performed best with the 30-sphere representation, achieving R 2 = 0.92 and MAPE = 14 % on an independent test dataset. In comparison, the Wen–Yu, Ganser, and Hoerner correlations yielded R 2 values of only 0.12–0.56. The proposed framework provides an efficient approach for predicting irregular-particle drag and supporting future CFD–DEM simulations of particle transport and pickup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: