Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy analysis reveals conventional agglomeration strategies fail peripheral regions, suggesting bespoke frameworks focused on well-being and local governance.
Place-based policies are back on the political agenda to address widening spatial inequalities. However, recent policies generally adhere to a narrow set of regional development strategies: create regional agglomerations and clusters to spur innovation-led growth. We contend that such tactics, while successful in urban cores, are not necessarily aligned with the needs of many peripheral regions. Place-based policies should therefore broaden their tactics to include approaches bespoke to peripheral contexts. Specifically, policymakers should empower regional actors, prioritise investments in well-being over economic growth and intervene in extractive flows. This article charts a path forward for more place-sensitive policy design for peripheral regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gansauer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: