Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study demonstrates pretreatment lung immune prognostic index predicts survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab, highlighting utility beyond PD-L1.
Background: The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI), based on the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase, may reflect systemic inflammation and tumor-related metabolic burden. This study evaluated the prognostic value of pretreatment LIPI and its relationship with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving nivolumab after first-line therapy. Methods: A total of 158 patients were included in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were classified into LIPI 0, LIPI 1, or LIPI 2 groups according to their pretreatment LIPI scores. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression. The prognostic value of LIPI was also evaluated within PD-L1-negative and PD-L1-positive subgroups, and LIPI × PD-L1 interactions were explored. Harrell’s concordance index was used to examine whether adding LIPI improved model discrimination beyond clinical variables and PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 data were available for 145 patients. Results: Median PFS was 566, 340, and 109 days for the LIPI 0, LIPI 1, and LIPI 2 groups, respectively, while median OS was 841, 760, and 201 days, respectively; the differences were statistically significant for both outcomes (both p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was 55.6%, 36.5%, and 4.9%, whereas the disease control rate (DCR) was 75.9%, 65.1%, and 14.6% in the LIPI 0, LIPI 1, and LIPI 2 groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, higher LIPI remained independently associated with shorter PFS and OS, with the strongest association observed in the LIPI 2 group. LIPI also differentiated survival outcomes within both PD-L1-negative and PD-L1-positive subgroups, although no significant LIPI × PD-L1 interaction was identified for PFS or OS. The addition of LIPI increased the C-index from 0.583 to 0.698 for PFS (ΔC-index, 0.115; p < 0.001) and from 0.588 to 0.697 for OS (ΔC-index, 0.109; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Pretreatment LIPI was independently associated with PFS and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving nivolumab after first-line therapy. Its association remained after adjustment for available PD-L1 expression data, and its addition improved model discrimination. These findings suggest that LIPI may provide prognostic information complementary to PD-L1 expression and routinely available clinical factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çağlar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: