Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis reveals hydration limits, pathway complexity, and activation energy barriers in hydrocarbon ionomer membranes, highlighting structural requirements for commercial fuel cells.
Hydrocarbon ionomers have emerged as promising per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)-free alternatives to perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) ionomers in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. This study systematically examines hydrocarbon ionomer performance over a broad range of humidity and temperature conditions to identify the key challenges limiting commercial viability. The first challenge is the low water content per acid group at a given relative humidity, as hydrocarbon ionomers exhibit less swelling on an acid-normalized basis. The second challenge is the complexity of proton conduction pathways; analysis using percolation theory suggests that hydrocarbon ionomers exhibit significantly more complex conduction pathways than PFSA ionomers. The third challenge is proton transport activation energy, as determined by Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann analysis, which shows that hydrocarbon ionomers can achieve activation energies comparable to PFSAs, but only with specific ionomer architectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bangay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: