Theoretical analysis reveals the role of policy entrepreneurship in policy sciences, highlighting its dual empirical and translational practices.
This article argues that the policy entrepreneurship (PE) literature exemplifies and contributes to the new policy sciences, a development that seeks to recover Harold Lasswell’s vision of a contextualized, problem-oriented, multi-method discipline bridging basic and applied research. Using tools from the tradition of practical argumentation and formal debate, the article builds a prima facie case, tracing PE scholarship from collective action theory through Kingdon, Capano and colleagues, and Mintrom to show its emphasis on agency and context, and an extended case identifying two connected research practices: an empirical practice generating generalizable knowledge and a translational practice rendering it usable for practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petridou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: