Key result
3D-Nicks procedure maintains root geometry over 14 years to facilitate safe TAV-in-SAV without coronary obstruction.
Why the study?
In patients with a small aortic annulus or small sinus of Valsalva, the risk of coronary artery obstruction or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch remains a major constraint for TAV-in-SAV.
Case Report (n=1)
No
The 3D-Nicks procedure during initial SAVR maintained favorable aortic root dimensions, facilitating safe long-term TAV-in-SAV without coronary obstruction.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for structural valve deterioration (SVD) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is an established alternative to redo surgery (transcatheter aortic valve-insurgical aortic valve, or TAV-in-SAV).However, in patients with a small aortic annulus or small sinus of Valsalva (SOV), the risk of coronary artery obstruction or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) remains a major constraint.To address this, we previously introduced the "3D-Nicks" procedure, using a preoperatively prepared three-dimensional ellipsoidal patch to achieve circumferential aortic root enlargement.We report a 14-year successful clinical course of TAV-in-SAV following SAVR with the 3D-Nicks procedure.A 61-year-old woman with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and a narrow aortic root (annulus 19 mm, STJ 20 mm) underwent SAVR (CEP19 ® mm, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) combined with the 3D-Nicks technique.Around 14 years postoperatively, she developed severe SVD.Contrast CT demonstrated that 3D-Nicks had maintained ample root geometry (SOV 30.2-36.8 mm, STJ 31.8 mm, VTC > 5.0 mm, VTSTJ > 6.0 mm).TAV-in-SAV was successfully performed using a 23 mm Evolut FX ® valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) via transfemoral access without coronary protection.Postoperative echocardiography showed excellent hemodynamics (mean PG 6 mmHg, EOAi 1.29 cm²/m²), which remained stable at the three-year follow-up (EOAi 1.16 cm²/m²).This case highlights that the 3D-Nicks procedure may provide favorable three-dimensional aortic root dimensions that facilitate safe long-term TAV-in-SAV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masuda et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Structural valve deterioration after surgical aortic valve replacement (n=1). TAV-in-SAV following SAVR with the 3D-Nicks procedure was evaluated on Hemodynamics (mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area index) and procedural success. The 3D-Nicks procedure maintained ample aortic root geometry over 14 years, facilitating safe TAV-in-SAV without coronary obstruction and yielding excellent hemodynamics (mean PG 6 mmHg) at 3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: