Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study uncovers differential protective effects against burnout among Olympic coaches, highlighting employment status as a key factor shaping stress coping mechanisms.
Stress is a well-established antecedent of job burnout, while social support and self-efficacy serve as key protective resources whose roles may vary by employment status, a dimension that remains underexplored in research on coaches' burnout. The current study aimed to examine the mediation effects of social support and self-efficacy on the relationship between stress and job burnout, as well as to analyze the moderating effect of permanent/temporary job status. A total of 231 coaches registered with the Korean Sport & Olympic Committee and the Korean Paralympic Committee were recruited for the study and conditional process analysis was used for model testing. Stress exerted a significant direct effect on job burnout, while social support and self-efficacy served as indirect protective resources whose effects differed by employment status. Specifically, the buffering role of social support was stronger among coaches in permanent positions, whereas self-efficacy played a more critical role among coaches in temporary positions. These findings indicate that the stress-resource-burnout process operates differently depending on employment context, highlighting employment status as a key factor shaping burnout mechanisms among coaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: