Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates aerodynamic stall modifications increase convective heat transfer in dairy cattle, highlighting design strategies to relieve heat stress.
Heat stress remains a major constraint in dairy production. Mechanically cross-ventilated barns mitigate thermal load, but conventional in-line freestall layouts create wake interference that reduces airflow to downstream cows. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD), with numerical verification and benchmarking against empirical bluff-body correlations, to evaluate stall-level strategies for improving cow body sensible convective heat transfer. Simulations represented a head-to-head freestall section with anatomically realistic Holstein cows at inlet velocities of 0.5–3.0 m s−1. Five configurations were examined: baseline in-line, staggered, staggered with an overhead baffle, single 45° vertical deflector, and double vertical deflectors. The staggered configuration increased the mean second-row cow body sensible convective heat-transfer rate by approximately 15–20% relative to the baseline, while the single deflector increased it by up to 29%. At 3.0 m s−1, the double-deflector configuration produced an approximate 34% increase. A representative AOZ analysis at 1.0 m s−1 showed that greater heat-transfer performance did not necessarily correspond to lower plane-wide velocity variation. These findings demonstrate that stall-level aerodynamic modifications can enhance cow body sensible convective heat transfer under controlled modeling assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: