Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review demonstrates survival benefits from HER2- and CLDN18.2-targeted therapies in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, highlighting expanding precision oncology options.
Background/Objectives: Advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) carries a poor prognosis, with median overall survival of 13–20 months despite standard chemotherapy. Since trastuzumab’s approval, biomarker-driven precision therapies have expanded rapidly. This review comprehensively summarises current and emerging targeted agents across the key molecular targets driving advanced GEA. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching English-language human studies published between February and July 2026, supplemented by updates during editing to reflect current standards. Results: HER2-directed therapy has progressed from trastuzumab through dual blockade, immunotherapy combinations, next-generation ADCs (notably trastuzumab deruxtecan) and bispecific antibodies such as zanidatamab, which has now overtaken trastuzumab in the first-line setting. CLDN18.2-targeted zolbetuximab has demonstrated survival benefit in biomarker-selected patients, with newer ADCs, BiTEs and the first approved solid-tumour CAR-T therapy (satricabtagene autoleucel) extending this target further. VEGFR2 inhibition with ramucirumab remains a cornerstone in later lines, while novel VEGF/PD-1(L1) bispecifics are under investigation. FGFR2b-targeted bemarituzumab showed early promise that weakened on phase 3 confirmation, and MET/EGFR-directed agents, including savolitinib and amivantamab, require stringent biomarker selection to demonstrate benefit amid tumour heterogeneity. Conclusions: Novel targeted agents, particularly to HER2 and CLDN18.2, have demonstrated survival benefit despite ongoing challenges. Other lines are more investigational.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oakley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: