Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review reveals mutually compatible timescales across minerals in silicic magmas, highlighting the reliability of modern diffusion coefficients for volcanic monitoring.
Diffusion chronometry based on quartz and feldspars has the potential to place robust constraints on the timescales of magma storage, recharge, and mobilization in silicic magmas. However, widespread application of these methods has been hindered by the fact that published diffusion coefficients for Ti in quartz and for Sr, Ba, and Mg in plagioclase and alkali feldspar differ by orders of magnitude, leading to large and often irreconcilable discrepancies in inferred timescales. In this review, we first compile existing experimental diffusivities in quartz and feldspars and critically evaluate the origins of discrepancies among published datasets, including experimental design, analytical protocols, and underlying assumptions. We then review studies performed on natural samples in which diffusion timescales based on Ti gradients in quartz were compared with ones based on Sr, Ba, and/or Mg diffusion in feldspars and/or other methods. To allow proper comparison, we complement previously reported timescales with ones calculated based on more recently published diffusion coefficients. This exercise reveals that internally consistent and mutually compatible timescales can be obtained with the most recent set of diffusion coefficients. Building on these conclusions, we outline best-practice recommendations for the generation, selection, and application of diffusion coefficients that are geologically meaningful and appropriate for natural magmatic systems. We conclude by identifying key experimental gaps that must be addressed to further refine diffusion models and to establish a coherent and broadly accepted framework for diffusion chronometry in silicic magmas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Audétat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: