Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals heavy concentration of IoT-LLM healthcare systems in wearable remote monitoring, highlighting critical gaps in clinical validation and data security.
The convergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the Internet of Things (IoT) is driving a transformative shift toward a continuous, context-aware smart healthcare ecosystem. Due to its novelty, existing research in this domain remains fragmented, leaving a critical gap in unified frameworks that synthesize domain applications, functional AI deployment roles, network architectures, and security boundaries. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this paper presents a systematic literature review and quantitative analysis evaluating a selected corpus of 61 peer-reviewed and 14 preprint papers in this domain. Methodologically, we assess a novel hybrid article discovery strategy, finding that an AI-powered prompt-based literature search strategy achieves higher precision than traditional keyword-based Boolean queries (86% vs. 42%) on the evaluated search sample, which may reduce screening workloads. We found that the major limitation of AI-based literature search is non-determinism, which is also an inherent property of LLM-powered applications. To address this, we propose methodological guidelines for using an AI-assisted hybrid literature search strategy. Based on the selected literature, we establish a multi-layer taxonomy organizing the IoT-LLM advances in the healthcare domain across four pillars: application domain, LLM role, IoT device type, and architectural deployment pattern. Quantitative synthesis reveals a heavy research concentration in remote patient monitoring and personal health management (representing 59% of the corpus combined), primarily driven by the data accessibility of wearable sensors (64%). Cross-tabulation uncovers a distinct capability–constraint spectrum: cloud-based deployments lean on heavyweight state-of-the-art models (mainly GPT-family models) for complex semantic reasoning, whereas edge, federated, and blockchain-based hybrid systems leverage localized models (BERT and LLaMA families). Patient data privacy and reduced communication overhead were among the main reasons for choosing localized models. Crucially, our assessment reveals a pervasive neglect of LLM-specific vulnerabilities such as prompt injection and jailbreak attacks and a tendency to treat regulatory frameworks (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR) as design features rather than empirically validated compliance metrics. Finally, we propose an actionable future research agenda prioritizing multi-device system orchestration, emergency care integration, privacy-preserving LLMs, and deployment-scale clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mekala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: