Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals multi-level eco-design integration in the textile sector, highlighting organizational, technological, and regulatory drivers essential for circular transformation.
The textile industry plays a significant role in global economic growth, employment, and trade, yet it is among the most resource-intensive and environmentally damaging sectors. Growing concerns about waste, resource scarcity, and pollution highlight the need to shift from linear production towards circular economy systems. In this transition, eco-design has become a key strategy, because it supports circular practices such as durability, repairability, reuse, and recyclability. Although research is growing, work on eco-design in circular textile systems remains scattered, and there is limited understanding of how eco-design principles are integrated into circular economy practices and which factors influence their success. To address this gap, a systematic literature review of 49 peer-reviewed articles was conducted using the SPAR-4-SLR method, and the mechanisms linking eco-design to circular textile systems were identified through thematic synthesis. The organizational, technological, and regulatory factors shaping implementation were also analyzed. The results show that eco-design integration occurs at the product, process, and system levels and requires a combination of technological innovation, organizational capability, and supportive regulation. This review consolidates fragmented knowledge of eco-design within circular economy frameworks and offers insights into the conditions needed to enable circular transformation in the textile sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vickackaite et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: