Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pharmacokinetic study demonstrates sensitive urinary detection of zolpidem, zopiclone, and metabolites up to 84 hours in healthy volunteers, highlighting utility for forensic drug screening.
Zolpidem (Z1) and zopiclone (Z2) are widely prescribed for insomnia; but their misuse in drug‐facilitated crimes presents significant forensic and clinical challenges. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple and sensitive LC–MS/MS method, coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), for the simultaneous determination of Z1, Z2, and 18 phase I and phase II metabolites (20 species) in human urine. DLLME employed 1 mL of dichloromethane as extractant and 2 mL of acetonitrile as disperser per 2 mL of urine, reducing halogenated‐solvent use compared with conventional liquid–liquid extraction. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a HyPURITY C18 column with water–acetonitrile (70:30, v/v) containing 0.2% formic acid. Z1 and Z2 were validated according to ICH guidelines over 0.1–200 ng/mL, showing linearity ( R 2 > 0.999), accuracy (96.29%–99.56%), precision (RSD ≤ 3.12%), and recovery (96.12%–98.74%). Because authentic metabolite standards were unavailable, metabolite concentrations were estimated using parent‐drug calibration curves and are considered semi‐quantitative. In five healthy volunteers, hydroxylated and carboxylated metabolites peaked at 2–12 h and remained detectable up to 84 h. These findings support the method's potential for retrospective urinary screening of Z‐drug exposure in forensic and clinical toxicology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chauhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: