Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates high-yield hydrogen production and complete carbon monoxide suppression in biomass pyrolysis, indicating a viable pathway for negative-carbon energy conversion.
BACKGROUND Biomass pyrolysis for hydrogen is usually held back by modest H 2 yields and by the CO 2 and CO formed alongside. This work reports a closed‐loop NaOH molten salt system, tested on Euonymus japonicus over 500–700 °C, in which the melt both upgrades the gas and mineralizes the carbon it captures. RESULTS The minimum NaOH‐to‐biomass ratio needed to suppress COx completely rose with temperature, from 0.9:1 at 500 °C to 1.6:1 at 700 °C. At the optimum (700 °C, 1.6:1), CO and CO 2 disappeared from the gas, H 2 exceeded 85 vol%, CH₄ was the only carbon‐bearing species (14–15 vol%), and the total gas yield reached 3.4 times that of salt‐free pyrolysis. The cold gas efficiency reached 82%, and the hydrogen conversion efficiency exceeded unity above 600 °C, peaking at 1.65 at 700 °C; NaOH acts as both a reforming catalyst and, through carbonation, an additional hydrogen donor. The melt fixed more than half of the biomass carbon as Na 2 CO 3 (net increment 2.03 g at 700 °C), and this carbon was mineralized permanently as CaCO 3 via Na 2 CO 3 + Ca(OH) 2 → 2NaOH + CaCO 3 , which regenerated NaOH at 85.4% on average (maximum 91%). CONCLUSION A thermochemical conversion–thermal energy storage–carbon capture and sequestration (TC‐TES‐CCS) module is proposed that couples pyrolysis hydrogen production, CaO/Ca(OH) 2 heat storage and CO 2 mineralization into a closed loop with net‐negative‐carbon potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: