Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates complete protection against lethal fowl adenovirus in neonatal chicks via maternal antibody transfer, indicating an effective control strategy for poultry.
Fowl adenovirus serotype 11 (FAdV-11) is an emerging pathogen associated with inclusion body hepatitis (IBH) and high mortality in commercial broilers. In this study, we evaluated the protective efficacy of maternal antibody transfer against FAdV-11 in neonatal chicks. A hypervirulent FAdV-11 strain (FAdV-11/HB2022/1), isolated from an IBH outbreak in Hubei Province, China, caused 90% mortality in 1-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens; 7-day-old chicks exhibited no mortality but developed mild hepatic lesions and sustained viral replication. A soluble, trimeric Fiber subunit vaccine (Fiber282–569) was developed through rational truncation of the transmembrane domain, retaining both the shaft and head domains, with its homotrimeric conformation confirmed by size-exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS). Immunization of breeder hens with Fiber282–569 elicited high titers of FAdV-11-specific IgY and neutralizing antibodies that were efficiently transferred to progeny via the egg yolk. Upon lethal challenge with FAdV-11/HB2022/1, 1-day-old progeny chicks from vaccinated breeders exhibited 100% survival with no clinical signs, no gross pathological lesions, and undetectable viral loads in liver tissues, demonstrating complete protection. In contrast, all chicks from unvaccinated breeders succumbed within 5 days post-infection. These results demonstrate that maternal antibody transfer of the fiber-based subunit vaccine confers complete protection against lethal FAdV-11 infection in neonatal chicks, providing a safe and effective candidate strategy for controlling FAdV-11 in the poultry industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: