Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates high oil and copper adsorption by tunable Eucalyptus bark aerogels, highlighting sustainable biomass for environmental remediation.
Composition‐tunable lignocellulosic aerogels were produced from Eucalyptus spp. bark as adsorbents without additional chemical functionalization. Four formulations comprising cellulose, lignin, and microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) were freeze‐dried: cellulose (CEL), cellulose/MFC (CEL‐M), lignin/MFC (L‐M), and cellulose/lignin/MFC (CEL‐L‐M) aerogels. The samples were characterized by SEM, nitrogen physisorption, XRD, FTIR, density, and porosity. All aerogels exhibited ultralow density and porosity above 99%, with composition‐dependent fibrillar organization, crystallinity, and pore architecture. Bru nauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas ranged from 0.95 to 7.37 m 2 g −1 for as‐synthesized samples and reached 18.38 m 2 g −1 after Cu 2+ adsorption. CEL showed the highest used cooking‐oil uptake (approximately 40 g g −1 ), whereas CEL‐M performed best for used pump oil (38.81 g g −1 ). Cu 2+ adsorption increased from pH 2 to pH 4–5; CEL‐L‐M reached the highest capacity (1.1337 g g −1 ) at pH 5 after 30 min, while L‐M reached 0.8964 g g −1 within 15 min and remained above 1.06 g g −1 from 30 to 60 min. FTIR changes and Cu detection by EDS supported pH‐regulated binding at oxygen‐containing sites. Accordingly, cellulose, lignin, and MFC contributed differently: CEL maximized cooking‐oil uptake, CEL‐M maximized pump‐oil uptake, while L‐M and CEL‐L‐M provided the fastest Cu 2+ uptake and highest capacity, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: