Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical review demonstrates frequent surface reconstruction in perovskite carbon dioxide conversion catalysts, highlighting the necessity of rigorous operando methods for mechanistic validation.
Converting CO 2 into fuels and chemicals is a central challenge in sustainable chemistry. Perovskites offer compositional flexibility, tunable band structures, redox‐active B‐site cations, controllable defect chemistry, and a propensity for exsolution and surface reconstruction under operating conditions. This review critically synthesizes perovskite‐based CO 2 conversion across halide and lead‐free halide perovskites; Cu‐ and Fe‐substituted systems; oxynitrides and oxyfluorides; and thermochemical, chemical‐looping, solid oxide electrolysis, and methanation oxides. Using an evidence hierarchy that prioritizes 13 CO 2 isotope labeling, operando spectroscopy, local structure probes, and postreaction characterization, the analysis distinguishes established active‐site claims from activity correlations, identifies systems whose working catalyst is a reconstructed phase rather than the as‐synthesized perovskite, and outlines the standards needed for mechanism‐guided catalyst design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhuse et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: