Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical review demonstrates performance trade-offs of luminescent metal–organic framework pH sensors across sixty systems, highlighting design principles for point-of-care diagnostics.
Conventional pH probes suffer from mechanical fragility, dye leaching, aggregation-caused quenching, and single-intensity dependence. Luminescent metal–organic frameworks (LMOFs) address these limitations through structural tunability, multiple emission centers, permanent porosity, and ratiometric self-calibration. This review is organized around three axes: emission origin, signal output mode, and response mechanism. LMOF advantages are critically examined alongside limitations including guest leaching, limited reversibility, 40–60% sensitivity loss in complex matrices, and insufficient toxicity data. Analysis of over 60 systems reveals an inverse sensitivity–stability trade-off and establishes design rules across pH 1–14. Ratiometric mixed-lanthanide and dye@MOF architectures are highlighted for self-calibration, visible color changes, and smartphone readout. We identify four research directions: flexible wearables, smartphone diagnostics, machine learning-assisted discovery, and externally programmable MOFs. We propose the minimum reporting standard (MRS-MOF-pH) reporting standard and advocate for safe-by-design synthesis using endogenous metals (Zn2+, Mg2+, Fe3+). This review provides a unified design framework, an application-driven decision matrix, and a translational roadmap for point-of-care diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feizi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: