Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ruthenium (Ru) and ruthenium oxide (RuO 2 ) thin films were grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) using a novel zerovalent (1,5-hexadiene)(1-isopropyl-4-methylbenzene)Ru complex and O 2 as the Ru precursor and oxidant, respectively. The self-limiting growth mode for the Ru and RuO 2 ALD processes was achieved while varying the Ru precursor and O 2 feeding time. Metallic Ru films were deposited at growth temperatures of 230–350 °C, while the temperature window for the growth of the RuO 2 film was limited to <230 °C. At 270 °C, the growth per cycle (GPC) of Ru ALD was 0.076 nm/cycle, and the incubation times of Ru on SiO 2 and TiN substrates were considerably short (3 cycles on SiO 2, negligible on TiN) compared to that of Ru ALD from a high-valent Ru precursor and O 2 . The resistivity of the Ru film was as low as 29–36 μΩ·cm at growth temperatures of 270–350 °C. On the other hand, the RuO 2 film was grown at a low temperature of 200 °C and showed a GPC of 0.15 nm/cycle with a resistivity of ∼270 μΩ·cm. In situ quadruple mass spectrometry analysis of the CO 2 byproduct revealed that the amount of subsurface oxygen extracted during the Ru pulse half-cycle affected the resultant film phase, either Ru or RuO 2, which was strongly influenced by the growth temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: