Key result
Firstbeat fitness test accurately estimates VO2max with ~5% error versus direct measurement in athletes.
Why the study?
The study was designed to investigate the validity of VO2max estimation using the Firstbeat fitness test method during submaximal rowing and running programs in well-trained athletes.
Does the Firstbeat fitness test (FFT) method accurately estimate VO2max compared to maximal graded exercise testing in well-trained athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=90)
No
Does the Firstbeat fitness test (FFT) method accurately estimate VO2max compared to maximal graded exercise testing in well-trained athletes?
The Firstbeat fitness test provides a highly accurate, indirect estimation of VO2max in well-trained athletes using submaximal exercise programs.
May support Firstbeat use for VO2max estimation in athletes; leaves open validation in broader populations.
Background This study was designed to investigate the validity of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) estimation through the Firstbeat fitness test (FFT) method when using submaximal rowing and running programs for well-trained athletes. Methods Well-trained flatwater rowers (n = 45, 19.8 ± 3.0 years, 184 ± 8.7 cm, 76 ± 12.9 kg, and 58.7 ± 6.0 mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) and paddlers (n = 45, 19.0 ± 2.5 years, 180 ± 7.7 cm, 74 ± 9.4 kg, and 59.9 ± 4.8 mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) completed the FFT and maximal graded exercise test (GXT) programs of rowing and running, respectively. The estimated VO2max was calculated using the FFT system, and the measured VO2max was obtained from the GXT programs. Differences between the estimated and measured VO2max values were analyzed to assess the accuracy and agreement of the predictions. Equations from the previous study were also used to predict the VO2max in the submaximal programs to compare the accuracy of prediction with the FFT method. Results The FFT method was in good agreement with the measured VO2max in both groups based on the intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.8). Additionally, the FFT method had considerable accuracy in VO2max estimation as the mean absolute percentage error (≤5.0%) and mean absolute error (<3.0 mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) were fairly low. Furthermore, the FFT method seemed more accurate in the estimation of VO2max than previously reported equations, especially in the rowing test program. Conclusion This study revealed that the FFT method provides a considerably accurate estimation of VO2max in well-trained athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Well-trained athletes (rowers and paddlers) (n=90). Firstbeat fitness test (FFT) vs. Maximal graded exercise test (GXT) was evaluated on Agreement between estimated VO2max from FFT and measured VO2max from GXT (p=<0.001). The Firstbeat fitness test method provided a highly accurate estimation of VO2max in well-trained athletes, demonstrating good agreement with directly measured VO2max (ICC >0.8) and low mean absolute percentage error (≤5.0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: