Key result
Perioperative goal-directed therapy is linked to fewer cardiovascular and surgical complications versus conventional fluids.
Why the study?
Postoperative complications, particularly cardiovascular events, remain a challenge after kidney transplantation, and it was unknown whether perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy improves major postoperative complication rates and delayed graft function compared with conventional fluid therapy.
Does perioperative goal-directed fluid-therapy reduce major postoperative complications in ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation?
Cohort (n=66)
Does perioperative goal-directed fluid-therapy reduce major postoperative complications in ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation?
p-value: p=<0.05 for cardiovascular complications and DGF; <0.01 for surgical complications
Perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy with stroke volume optimization significantly reduces cardiovascular and surgical complications, as well as delayed graft function, in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
PGDT was associated with fewer cardiovascular complications in kidney transplant recipients; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm benefit.
Background: Kidney transplantation is considered the first-choice therapy in ESRD patients. Despite recent improvements in terms of outcomes and graft survival in recipients, postoperative complications still concern health-care providers involved in the management of those patients. Particularly challenging are cardiovascular complications. Perioperative goal-directed fluid-therapy (PGDT) and hemodynamic optimization are widely used in high-risk surgical patients, and are associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complication rates and length of stay (LOS). The aim of this work is to compare the effects of perioperative goal-directed therapy (PGDT) with conventional fluid therapy (CFT), and to determine whether there are any differences in major postoperative complications rates and delayed graft function (DGF) outcomes. Methods: Prospective study with historical controls. Two groups, a PGDT- and a CFT- group were used: the stroke volume (SV) optimization protocol was applied in PGDT group throughout the procedure. Conventional fluid therapy with fluids titration at a central venous pressure (CVP) 8-12 mmHg and mean arterial pressure (MAP) >80mmHg was applied to the control-group. Postoperative data collection including vital signs, weight, urinary output, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium, and assessement of volemic status and the signs and symptoms of major postoperative complications occurred at 24h, 72h, 7 days and 30 days after transplantation. Results: Among the 66 patients enrolled, 33 were in each group and both groups had similar physical characteristics. Good fuctional recovery was evident in the 94% of patients. The statistical analysis has showed a difference in postoperative complications as follows: significant reduction of cardiovascular complications, DGF episodes (p<0.05) and surgical complications (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in pulmonary or other complication. Conclusions: PGDT and SV optimization effectively influenced the rate of major postoperative complications, reducing the overall morbidity and thus the mortality in patients receiving kidney transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavaleri et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring kidney transplantation (n=66). Perioperative goal-directed fluid-therapy (PGDT) with stroke volume optimization vs. Conventional fluid therapy (CFT) with CVP 8-12 mmHg and MAP >80mmHg was evaluated on Major postoperative complications rates and delayed graft function (DGF) outcomes (p=<0.05 for cardiovascular complications and DGF; <0.01 for surgical complications). Perioperative goal-directed therapy significantly reduced cardiovascular complications and delayed graft function (p<0.05), and surgical complications (p<0.01) versus conventional fluid therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: