Key result
Automated vessel-tracking techniques for CTA of the lower extremities produced centerline extractions that observers could not distinguish from manual segmentation (area under the DROC curve 0.56).
Why the study?
Does automated vessel-tracking provide comparable diagnostic reliability and image quality to manual segmentation in CTA of the lower extremities in men with vascular diseases?
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
Does automated vessel-tracking provide comparable diagnostic reliability and image quality to manual segmentation in CTA of the lower extremities in men with vascular diseases?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.56
Automated 3D vessel-tracking techniques for lower extremity CTA provide reliable and time-efficient centerline extractions that are comparable to manual methods.
Supports automated centerline extraction in lower extremity CTA; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
PURPOSE: To show the feasibility of acquiring homogenous 3-dimensional datasets with high temporal and spatial resolution from computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) scans of the lower extremities and to assess automated vessel-tracking techniques for vascular evaluation. METHODS: Eighteen men (mean age 67.0 years, range 43-83) with aneurysmal or occlusive vascular diseases underwent contrast-enhanced CTA of the lower limb arteries utilizing a 16-row CT imager. Curved multiplanar reformations were generated by manual selection of vessel centerlines in the infrarenal aorta and the arterial vasculature in the pelvis, thigh, and calf based on volume-rendering techniques. For each vessel, opacification and depiction were quantitatively evaluated. The manually segmented images were compared to datasets processed with automated vessel-tracking strategies by 5 radiologists, who evaluated diagnostic reliability and image quality. A Differential Receiver Operating Characteristic (DROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: An increase in the temporal and spatial resolution led to acquisition of high quality CTA datasets. Significant homogeneity of the vascular contrast-to-noise ratios was achieved in the pelvic (coefficient of variance 1.5% to 10.1%), thigh (0.1% to 9.4%), and calf (3.3% to 19.2%) vessels. The assessment of vascular delineation revealed full-width-at-half-maximum contrast values of 96.4%, 95.5%, and 111.3% in the pelvis, thigh, and calf, respectively. Observers were not able to distinguish between manual and automated vascular segmentation, as represented by a 0.56 value for the area under the DROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution CTA lower extremity datasets were acquired successfully, presenting vascular signal intensities of high homogeneity suitable for automated vessel-tracking techniques. Automated 3D visualization tools produced reliable, reproducible, and time-efficient centerline extractions that were comparable to manually defined centerlines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boll et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Aneurysmal or occlusive vascular diseases (n=18). Automated vessel-tracking techniques vs. Manual selection of vessel centerlines was evaluated on Distinguishability between manual and automated vascular segmentation (AUC 0.56). Automated vessel-tracking techniques for CTA of the lower extremities produced centerline extractions that observers could not distinguish from manual segmentation (area under the DROC curve 0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: