Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and increases thromboembolic complications and cardiovascular mortality, but no optimal prognostic marker for its onset and progression exists.
This review summarizes that atrial fibrillation occurrence and progression are predicted by a combination of electrophysiological, structural, functional, neurohumoral, pro-inflammatory, hypercoagulable, and genetic factors.
The aim was to summarize and present a current views on the clinical, electrophysiological, hemodynamic and neurohumoral predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence and progression by reviewing contemporary specialized literature. Atrial fibrillation has been shown to be the most common cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice, associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications and cardiovascular mortality. However, there is no optimal prognostic marker for this type of arrhythmia onset and progression. Conclusions. It has been established that the main predictors of atrial fibrillation and its complications are electrophysiological, structural and functional changes of the heart with underlying neurohumoral and pro-inflammatory activation, hypercoagulation and genetic predisposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. M. Kyselov (2021) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Clinical, electrophysiological, hemodynamic and neurohumoral predictors was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation occurrence and progression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: