Key result
Marked variability in fetal heart rate in the 60 minutes before delivery was associated with a significantly increased risk of neonatal acidosis (aRR 2.30; 95% CI 1.53-3.44).
Why the study?
The study was designed to assess the association between marked variability in fetal heart rate and neonatal acidosis.
Does marked fetal heart rate variability predict neonatal acidosis in women in labour at term?
Cohort (n=4,394)
Yes
Does marked fetal heart rate variability predict neonatal acidosis in women in labour at term?
Relative Risk: 2.3 (95% CI 1.53–3.44)
Marked fetal heart rate variability in the 60 minutes before delivery is associated with a twofold increased risk of neonatal acidosis.
Marked variability may flag acidosis risk in term labor; leaves open prospective validation before guiding intrapartum decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between marked variability in fetal heart rate (FHR) and neonatal acidosis. DESIGN: Bicentric prospective cohort study. SETTING: From January 2019 to December 2019, in two French tertiary care maternity units. POPULATION: Women in labour at ≥37 weeks of gestation, with continuous FHR monitoring until delivery and with the availability of umbilical arterial pH. Women with intrauterine fetal death or medical termination, multiple pregnancies, non-cephalic presentation or planned caesarean delivery were excluded. METHODS: The exposure was marked variability in FHR in the 60 minutes before delivery, defined as a variability greater than 25 beats per minute, with a minimum duration of 1 minute. To assess the association between marked variability and neonatal acidosis, we used multivariable modified Poisson regression modelling. We then conducted subgroup analyses according to the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) category of the associated fetal heart rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal acidosis, defined as an umbilical artery pH of ≤7.10. RESULTS: Among the 4394 women included, 177 (4%) had marked variability in fetal heart rate in the 60 minutes before delivery. Acidosis occurred in 6.0% (265/4394) of the neonates. In the multivariable analysis, marked variability was significantly associated with neonatal acidosis (aRR 2.30, 95% CI 1.53-3.44). In subgroup analyses, the association between marked variability and neonatal acidosis remained significant in NICHD category-I and category-II groups. CONCLUSIONS: Marked variability was associated with a twofold increased risk of neonatal acidosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loussert et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Neonatal acidosis (n=4,394). Marked variability in fetal heart rate vs. No marked variability was evaluated on Neonatal acidosis, defined as an umbilical artery pH of ≤7.10 (aRR 2.30, 95% CI 1.53-3.44). Marked variability in fetal heart rate in the 60 minutes before delivery was associated with a significantly increased risk of neonatal acidosis (aRR 2.30; 95% CI 1.53-3.44).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: