Key result
Compared with non-invasive management, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent implantation reduced the length of hospital stay by 0.37-2.37 days and 0.12-2.28 days, respectively, at the 0.2-0.9 quantile of length of stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
Length of hospital stay in ACS patients is crucial for outcomes and resource management, but the impact of different treatment approaches on hospitalization duration needed exploration.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention reduce the length of hospital stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=7,109)
No
Does percutaneous coronary intervention reduce the length of hospital stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Mean Difference: -0.6675 (95% CI -1.0487–-0.2864)
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a reduced length of hospital stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome, particularly those at risk for prolonged hospitalization.
PCI may shorten LOS in ACS patients prone to prolonged stays; leaves open optimal use in lower-risk subgroups.
BACKGROUND: The length of hospital stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is crucial for determining clinical outcomes, managing healthcare resources, controlling costs, and ensuring patient well-being. This study aimed to explore the impact of treatment approaches on the length of stay (LOS) for ACS patients. METHODS: A total of 7109 ACS cases were retrospectively recruited from a hospital between 2018 and 2023. Demographical baseline data, laboratory examinations, and diagnostic and treatment information of the included subjects were extracted from electronic medical records to investigate the factors contributing to extended hospitalization and further explore the impact of treatment management on the LOS. RESULTS: Advanced age, female sex, and elevated levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were identified as risk factors for extended hospitalization. At the 0.2-0.9 quantile of LOS, compared with the non-invasive group, the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group and the stent implantation group exhibited decreases in LOS of 0.37-2.37 days and 0.12-2.28 days, respectively. Stratified analysis based on diagnosis showed that percutaneous coronary intervention decreased hospitalization time in the high quantile of LOS but conversely increased it in the low quantile. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous coronary intervention is important for reducing hospitalization duration, particularly for patients susceptible to prolonged stays. Early and assertive management intervention, incorporating elements such as lipid-lowering therapy, and anti-inflammatory agents, is essential for improving outcomes within high-risk groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=7,109). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) vs. Non-invasive management was evaluated on Length of hospital stay (MD -0.6675 days, 95% CI -1.0487 to -0.2864, p=<0.001). Compared with non-invasive management, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent implantation reduced the length of hospital stay by 0.37-2.37 days and 0.12-2.28 days, respectively, at the 0.2-0.9 quantile of length of stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: