Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The micromechanical interlocking between dentinal walls and root canal sealer aids in achieving a three-dimensional impermeable hermetic seal. Calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers are promising, but their comparative effectiveness in sealing dentinal tubules still needs further research. Objective: This study evaluated the penetration efficacy of four calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers – CeraSeal (Meta BIOMED Co., Cheongju, Korea), BioRoot™ (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France), Bio-C (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil), and SafeEndo BioActive RCS (SafeEndo, Vadodara, Gujarat) – into dentinal tubules using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Methodology: Forty extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars were decoronated, prepared with ProTaper rotary files, and randomly divided into four groups according to the type of sealer used. Canals were filled using a cold lateral condensation technique, and sealer penetration was assessed at the middle third of the root with CLSM. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Results: Significant differences in dentinal tubule penetration were found among the sealers. CeraSeal (Meta-BIOMED Co., Cheongju, Korea) achieved the highest mean penetration at 1511.8 µm, followed closely by BioRoot™ (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France) at 1488.6 µm ( P < 0.05), indicating superior performance. Conclusion: CeraSeal and BioRoot™ demonstrate superior tubular penetration, suggesting their advantages for effective sealing in root canal therapy. Future studies should investigate their long-term clinical efficacy in complex root canal systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: