Key result
Smartphone-based PPG monitoring detects AF in ~17% of patients after cardiac surgery discharge.
Why the study?
The precise incidence and significance of arrhythmias after discharge home following cardiac surgery needed better definition, and the implementation of PPG-based smartphone apps for rhythm monitoring required evaluation.
Does heart rhythm monitoring using a PPG-based smartphone app detect atrial fibrillation and other rhythm complications in patients discharged after cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=24)
No
Does heart rhythm monitoring using a PPG-based smartphone app detect atrial fibrillation and other rhythm complications in patients discharged after cardiac surgery?
Smartphone-based PPG monitoring after cardiac surgery can detect incident arrhythmias, which may serve as an early indicator of underlying postoperative complications.
PPG smartphone monitoring detects post-discharge AF and complications after cardiac surgery; supports prospective trials before routine adoption.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery, yet the precise incidence and significance of arrhythmias after discharge home need to be better defined. Photoplethysmography (PPG)-based smartphone apps are promising tools to enable early detection and follow-up of arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE By using a PPG-based smartphone app, we aimed to gain more insight into the prevalence of AF and other rhythm-related complications upon discharge home after cardiac surgery and evaluate the implementation of this app into routine clinical care. METHODS In this prospective, single-center trial, patients recovering from cardiac surgery were asked to register their heart rhythm 3 times daily using a Food and Drug Administration–approved PPG-based app, for either 30 or 60 days after discharge home. Patients with permanent AF or a permanent pacemaker were excluded. RESULTS We included 24 patients (mean age 60.2 years, SD 12 years; 15/23, 65% male) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. During hospitalization, 39% (9/23) experienced postoperative AF. After discharge, the PPG app reported AF or atrial flutter in 5 patients. While the app notified flutter in 1 patient, this was a false positive, as electrocardiogram revealed a 2nd-degree, 2:1 atrioventricular block necessitating a permanent pacemaker. AF was confirmed in 4 patients (4/23, 17%) and interestingly, was associated with an underlying postoperative complication in 2 participants (pneumonia n=1, pericardial tamponade n=1). A significant increase in the proportion of measurements indicating sinus rhythm was observed when comparing the first to the second month of follow-up (P<.001). In the second month of follow-up, compliance was significantly lower with 2.2 (SD 0.7) measurements per day versus 3.0 (SD 0.8) measurements per day in the first month (P=.002). The majority of participants (17/23, 74%), as well as the surveyed primary care physicians, experienced positive value by using the app as they felt more involved in the postoperative rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of smartphone-based PPG technology enables detection of AF and other rhythm-related complications after cardiac surgery. An association between AF detection and an underlying complication was found in 2 patients. Therefore, smartphone-based PPG technology may supplement rehabilitation after cardiac surgery by acting as a sentinel for underlying complications, rhythm-related or otherwise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamberigts et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Recovery from cardiac surgery (n=24). Photoplethysmography (PPG)-based smartphone app was evaluated on Prevalence of AF and other rhythm-related complications upon discharge home. Smartphone-based PPG monitoring detected atrial fibrillation in 17% (4/23) of patients after discharge from cardiac surgery, with 2 cases associated with underlying postoperative complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: