Key result
TTE accurately estimates pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and cardiac output in critically ill adults.
Why the study?
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately provide diagnostic and haemodynamic data compared to transoesophageal echocardiography or invasive measurements in critically ill adults?
Systematic Review (n=10)
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately provide diagnostic and haemodynamic data compared to transoesophageal echocardiography or invasive measurements in critically ill adults?
Transthoracic echocardiography is a valuable non-invasive tool that can accurately estimate pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and cardiac output in critically ill adults, though transoesophageal echocardiography may yield additional diagnostic findings.
Supports non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring in the ICU; extends Level-1 evidence for TTE versus invasive standards.
We systematically assessed the utility of diagnostic data and the accuracy of haemodynamic data obtained by transthoracic echocardiography in critically ill adults, by examination of prospective studies in unselected adult intensive care patients. Of the ten studies identified, three examined the diagnostic utility of transthoracic echocardiography. Thirty-eight percent of clinical questions were answered by a single transthoracic echocardiogram. The weighted mean percentage of clinical findings yielded by transoesophageal echocardiography not found by the transthoracic approach was 33% (range 28–50%). Four studies examined the correlation between transthoracic echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and pulmonary artery catheter-derived measurement. Correlation was strong in all studies: for example in one study r=0.98, p<0.001, with a mean difference of 0.0 (2.5) mm Hg by the Bland-Altman technique. Three studies examined the correlation between transthoracic echocardiography and thermodilution-derived cardiac output measurement. Correlation varied with the echocardiographic technique used and correlated best with Dopplerderived measurement: r=0.93, p<0.0001, mean difference of 0.2 (0.82) litres per minute. The diagnostic utility of transthoracic echocardiography compared with transoesophageal echocardiography in the critically ill cannot be reliably assessed from the available studies. More relevantly designed studies are required. Transthoracic echocardiography can accurately estimate pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, but the technique requires the patient to be in sinus rhythm. Transthoracic echocardiography can also accurately estimate cardiac output in the critically ill. Further studies should concentrate on Doppler-based assessments. The scene is now set for the development of this valuable non-invasive tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colebourn et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review in Critically ill adults (n=10). Transthoracic echocardiography vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography, pulmonary artery catheter, or thermodilution was evaluated on Diagnostic utility and accuracy of haemodynamic data (pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and cardiac output). Transthoracic echocardiography accurately estimates pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (r=0.98, p<0.001) and cardiac output (r=0.93, p<0.0001) in critically ill adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: