Key result
Pediatric NTRK1/3 tumors show distinct Trk expression and ETV6-NTRK3 fusions link to excellent prognosis.
Why the study?
While ETV6-NTRK3 fusion is common in infantile fibrosarcoma, NTRK1/3 fusion in pediatric tumors is scarce and not well known.
Case Report (n=9)
No
Distinct Trk immunopositivity patterns and specific immunohistochemical coexpressions can suggest the presence of specific NTRK fusion partner genes in pediatric mesenchymal tumors.
Trk IHC patterns may suggest specific NTRK fusions in pediatric tumors; hypothesis-generating and requires validation in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: While ETV6- NTRK3 fusion is common in infantile fibrosarcoma, NTRK1/3 fusion in pediatric tumors is scarce and, consequently, not well known. Herein, we evaluated for the presence of NTRK1/3 fusion in pediatric mesenchymal tumors, clinicopathologically and immunophenotypically. METHODS: We reviewed nine NTRK fusion-positive pediatric sarcomas confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or next-generation sequencing from Seoul National University Hospital between 2002 and 2020. RESULTS: One case of TPR-NTRK1 fusion-positive intracranial, extra-axial, high-grade undifferentiated sarcoma (12-year-old boy), one case of LMNA-NTRK1 fusion-positive low-grade infantile fibrosarcoma of the forehead (3-year-old boy), one case of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion-positive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) (3-months-old girl), and six cases of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion-positive infantile fibrosarcoma (median age: 2.6 months, range: 1.6-5.6 months, M: F = 5:1) were reviewed. The Trk immunopositivity patterns were distinct, depending on what fusion genes were present. We observed nuclear positivity in TPR-NTRK1 fusion-positive sarcoma, nuclear membrane positivity in LMNA-NTRK1 fusion-positive sarcoma, and both cytoplasmic and nuclear positivity in ETV6-NTRK3 fusion-positive IMT and infantile fibrosarcomas. Also, the TPR-NTRK1 fusion-positive sarcoma showed robust positivity for CD34/nestin, and also showed high mitotic rate. The LMNA-NTRK1 fusion-positive sarcoma revealed CD34/S100 protein/nestin/CD10 coexpression, and a low mitotic rate. The IMT with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion expressed SMA. Six infantile fibrosarcomas with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion showed variable coexpression of nestin (6/6)/CD10 (4/5)/ S100 protein (3/6). CONCLUSIONS: All cases of NTRK1 and NTRK3 fusion-positive pediatric tumors robustly expressed the Trk protein. A Trk immunopositive pattern and CD34/S100/nestin/CD10/SMA immunohistochemical expression may suggest the presence of NTRK fusion partner genes. LMNA-NTRK1 fusion sarcoma might be a low-grade subtype of infantile fibrosarcoma. Interestingly, more than half of the infantile fibrosarcoma cases were positive for S100 protein and CD10. The follow-up period of TPR-NTRK1 and LMNA-NTRK1 fusion-positive tumors are not enough to predict prognosis. However, ETV6-NTRK3 fusion-positive infantile fibrosarcomas showed an excellent prognosis with no evidence of disease for an average of 11.7 years, after gross total resection of the tumor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Pediatric NTRK fusion mesenchymal tumors (n=9). NTRK fusion (TPR-NTRK1, LMNA-NTRK1, ETV6-NTRK3) was evaluated on Clinicopathological findings and Trk immunopositivity patterns. Pediatric NTRK1 and NTRK3 fusion-positive mesenchymal tumors robustly expressed the Trk protein with distinct immunopositivity patterns depending on the fusion partner, and ETV6-NTRK3 fusion-positive infantile fibrosarcomas showed an excellent prognosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: