Key result
CMR reveals discordant DHE patterns in ~21% of patients conventionally diagnosed with ICM.
Why the study?
Does CMR-DHE imaging identify discordant myocardial fibrosis patterns compared to conventional diagnosis based on coronary anatomy in patients with systolic heart failure?
Observational (n=101)
Single-blind
Yes
Does CMR-DHE imaging identify discordant myocardial fibrosis patterns compared to conventional diagnosis based on coronary anatomy in patients with systolic heart failure?
CMR-DHE imaging reveals that a subset of patients conventionally diagnosed with ICM or NICM based on coronary anatomy have discordant or mixed fibrosis patterns, suggesting it can help better determine heart failure etiology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DHE fibrosis patterns may refine ICM/NICM classification beyond CAD presence; leaves open whether imaging should guide etiology or management.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of ischemic (ICM) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is conventionally determined by the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the setting of a reduced left systolic function. However the presence of CAD may not always indicate that the actual left ventricular (LV) dysfunction mechanism is ischemia, as other non-ischemic etiologies can be responsible. We investigated patterns of myocardial fibrosis using delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in ICM and NICM. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with systolic heart failure who underwent a CMR were prospectively analyzed. The heart failure diagnosis was based on the modified Framingham criteria and LVEF <35%. LV dysfunction was classified as ICM or NICM based on coronary anatomy. RESULTS: A total of 101 subjects were analyzed; 34 were classified as ICM and 67 as NICM. The DHE pattern was concordant with the conventional diagnosis in 27 (79.4%) of the patients with ICM and 62 (92.5%) of the patients with NCIM. A discordant NICM DHE pattern was present in 8.8% of patients with ICM, and an ICM pattern was detected 6.0% of the patients with NICM. Furthermore, 11.8% of the patients with ICM and 1.5% of those with NICM demonstrated a mixed pattern. CONCLUSION: A subset of patients conventionally diagnosed with ICM or NICM based on coronary anatomy demonstrated a discordant or mixed DHE pattern. CMR-DHE imaging can be helpful to determine the etiology of heart failure in patients with persistent LV systolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Systolic heart failure (n=101). Cardiac magnetic resonance delayed hyperenhancement (CMR-DHE) imaging vs. Conventional diagnosis based on coronary anatomy was evaluated on Concordance of delayed hyperenhancement pattern with conventional diagnosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed a discordant or mixed delayed hyperenhancement pattern in 20.6% of patients conventionally diagnosed with ischemic cardiomyopathy and 7.5% of those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: