Key result
Bromocriptine shows promise as an individualized peripartum cardiomyopathy treatment despite insufficient evidence for universal use.
Why the study?
Does bromocriptine improve outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy?
Does bromocriptine improve outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy?
Bromocriptine is a promising individualized treatment for peripartum cardiomyopathy, though evidence is currently insufficient for universal use.
May support individualized bromocriptine use in peripartum cardiomyopathy; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Objective This study is to review published cases of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) treated with bromocriptine and outline pros and cons of the treatment strategy. Data Sources Data were collected from PubMed/MedLine, ClinicalTrials.gov; the years 2007 to 2018 were searched for English-language articles. Search terms: “bromocriptine and peripartum cardiomyopathy”, “bromocriptine and cardiomyopathy.” Methods of Study Selection This search strategy yielded 171 articles. After excluding duplicates, 86 studies were reviewed. Sixty-one articles involving the treatment of PPCMP were included, and of these, 17 were case reports of patients with PPCMP treated with bromocriptine; these studies were included in this review. Tabulation, Integration, and Results Seventeen of these articles were case reports of patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy treated with bromocriptine that were included. Conclusion Bromocriptine seems to be a promising treatment, there is currently insufficient evidence for universal utilization of bromocriptine for all patients with PPCMP. Addition of bromocriptine to the standard heart failure therapy should be individualized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon‐Freeman et al. (2018) conducted a review in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Bromocriptine was evaluated. Bromocriptine appears to be a promising individualized treatment for peripartum cardiomyopathy based on a review of 17 case reports, though evidence is insufficient for universal utilization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: