This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The relative preference in adsorption among 19 common gas molecules, namely, C 2 H 2, C 2 H 4, C 2 H 6, CH 4, X 2, HX (X = F, Cl, Br), CO 2, CS 2, CO, H 2, H 2 O, H 2 S, N 2, NO 2, and NO within the cavity of cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6]) is investigated via density functional theory computations. Energies associated with the dissociation of gas@CB[6] producing CB[6] and gas molecules show the order of the efficacy to be encapsulated within CB[6], C 2 H 2 @CB[6] being the most viable system. However, the dissociation free energy change implies that CB[6] is most efficient in accommodating Cl 2 followed by C 2 H 2 among the considered gas molecules. In general, guest molecules having large surface contact with the host and/or high polarizability and/or having acidic hydrogen to make hydrogen bond with >C═O show larger propensity to be encapsulated within CB[6] cavitand. Functionalized CB[6] are better candidates for gas adsorption than CB[6]. However, the nature of functionalization needed to improve the adsorption ability varies with the change in the guest molecule. While full −C 2 H 5 substitution improves C 2 H 2 and CO 2 adsorption ability of CB[6] the most, the −CN functionalized CB[6] is the best candidate to encapsulate C 2 H 4 and C 2 H 6 among the studied −OH, −C 2 H 5, and −CN substituted analogues. The interaction is mostly of van der Waals type, except in the cases of C 2 H 2, H 2 O, H 2 S, and HX (X = F, Cl, Br), in which both the electrostatic and dispersion contributions are important owing to the interaction between acidic hydrogen of these guest molecules and oxygen centers of the host moiety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: