Key result
Clinical CT strongly correlates with micro CT for quantifying glenoid trabecular bone architecture and mineralization.
Why the study?
Does clinical CT imaging accurately quantify regional variations in glenoid trabecular bone architecture and mineralization compared to micro CT imaging?
Observational
Does clinical CT imaging accurately quantify regional variations in glenoid trabecular bone architecture and mineralization compared to micro CT imaging?
Clinical CT imaging can be used to quantify variations of a patient's glenoid bone at anatomic and peri-implant levels, potentially improving understanding of bone quality's role in glenoid component loosening.
May support noninvasive clinical CT assessment of glenoid bone quality; leaves open prospective links to loosening or outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of a clinical CT imaging and analysis technique to quantify regional variations in trabecular bone architecture and mineralization of glenoid bones. Specifically, our objective was to determine to what extent clinical CT imaging of intact upper extremities can describe variations of trabecular bone architectures at anatomic and peri-implant regions by comparing trabecular bone architectures as measured by high-resolution, micro CT imaging of same excised glenoid bones. Bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular bone thickness (TbTh), number of trabecular bone (TbN), spacing (TbS), pattern factor (TbPf), bone surface area (BSA), and skeletal connectivity (Conn.), in addition to bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), were quantified from both clinical and micro CT images using whole bone, anatomic, and peri-implant bone masks. Strong correlations of BVF, TbTh, TbSp, BMC, and BMD were found between clinical CT and micro CT imaging methods. The variations in BVF, TbTh, TbSp, TbN, BMC, and BMD at anatomical and peri-implant regions were larger than those at whole bone regions. In this study, we have demonstrated that this clinical CT imaging methodology can be used to quantify variations of a patient's glenoid bone at anatomic and peri-implant levels. Statement of Clinical Significance. An in vivo quantitative assessment of glenoid trabecular bone architecture in the anatomic and peri-implant regions may improve our understanding on the role of bone quality on glenoid component loosening following total shoulder arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jun et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Glenoid bone architecture. Clinical CT imaging vs. High-resolution micro CT imaging was evaluated on Correlation of trabecular bone architecture and mineralization metrics (BVF, TbTh, TbSp, BMC, BMD) between imaging methods. Clinical CT imaging demonstrated strong correlations with micro CT for quantifying regional variations in glenoid trabecular bone architecture and mineralization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: