OBJECTIVE: Atelectatic alveoli can be recruited or kept open either by sustained inflation maneuvers or by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Little is known about potential interactions between both approaches. Especially, it is not known whether the recruiting effect of sustained inflation maneuvers is maintained in combination with a low PEEP, as suggested recently. In an attempt to answer this question, we combined sustained inflation maneuvers with either high or low PEEP. Both approaches were compared with a strategy likely to result in alveolar atelectasis and with another ensuring adequate alveolar recruitment by adjustment of PEEP alone. DESIGN: Randomized block design. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Isolated perfused rabbit lungs (n = 28). INTERVENTIONS: The lungs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg. After stabilization, the lungs were randomized to one of four ventilatory strategies, which then were followed for 120 mins: a) PEEP 1 cm H2O (PEEP1, negative control); b) PEEP 1 cm H2O and 30 sec-sustained inflations (20 cm H2O) every 30 mins (SI-1); c) PEEP 3 cm H2O combined with sustained inflations (SI-3); and d) PEEP repeatedly adjusted following a previously established strategy ensuring full alveolar recruitment (DYN, positive control). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Distribution of ventilation and perfusion (Va/Q distribution) was analyzed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique. Volume-dependent compliance within the tidal volume was determined by using the slice method. Shunt and Va/Q mismatch significantly differed between SI-1 and SI-3, indicating full alveolar recruitment only in the latter. Data of SI-1 did not differ substantially from those of PEEP1, and data obtained in SI-3 were similar to those of DYN. CONCLUSIONS: First, enduring alveolar recruitment by sustained inflation maneuvers is only possible when the alveoli are stabilized thereafter by sufficient PEEP. Second, a ventilation strategy that uses repeated sustained inflations on a comparably high PEEP may not be superior to adequate adjustment of PEEP alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mols et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: