Key result
A logistic regression model using resting ECG and biomarkers classifies elite runners with ~81% AUC.
Why the study?
Conventional ECG interpretive algorithms often struggle to distinguish physiological cardiovascular adaptations in athletes from cardiac pathology.
Can machine learning of resting ECG and biological markers classify elite endurance capacity in physically active military males?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,296)
No
Can machine learning of resting ECG and biological markers classify elite endurance capacity in physically active military males?
Effect estimate: AUC 80.81%
Machine learning applied to resting 12-lead ECG and basic biological markers can effectively identify elite endurance capacity, offering a potential tool for recognizing 'athlete's heart'.
ML models achieved moderate discrimination for elite runners; leaves open whether ECG-based ML aids athlete screening or training monitoring.
Background Conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretive algorithms often struggle to distinguish physiological cardiovascular adaptations in athletes from cardiac pathology. This study utilized machine learning (ML) to estimate the likelihood of elite 3,000-meter running performance using resting ECG and biological markers within a large military cohort. Methods We analyzed data from 2,296 physically active military males in the Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Health in Eastern Armed Forces (CHIEF) Heart Study. Three ML classifiers—logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM)—were trained using 26 ECG features (axis, duration and voltage of P, QRS and T waves in each lead and supine heart rate) and 6 biological features (age, body weight, body height, waist circumference, blood pressure and sitting pulse rate) to classify “elite” runners (defined as the top 5% and 10% performance groups). The whole data were randomly grouped by a 3:1 ratio into a training/validation set ( N = 1,607) and a test set ( N = 689). Results For the top 10% runners, LR demonstrated the highest discriminative power (AUC: 80.81%), followed by MLP (78.43%). In the top 5% group, MLP performed best with an AUC of 74.42%. When specificity was fixed at approximately 60%–70%, the sensitivity of the optimal models for both groups exceeded 81%. Conclusions ML can effectively classify elite endurance capacity using non-invasive resting ECG markers. These findings highlight the potential for updating automated ECG interpretive algorithms to better recognize “athlete's heart.” Furthermore, this approach may serve as a cost-effective preliminary screening tool for identifying elite athletic potential, although further validation in female and more diverse populations is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Athlete's Heart / Elite endurance capacity (n=2,296). Machine learning classification using 12-lead ECG and biological features vs. Control group (remaining 90% of runners) was evaluated on Classification of top 10% elite 3,000-m runners (AUC 80.81%). A logistic regression model integrating 26 resting ECG features and 6 biological markers effectively classified top 10% elite 3,000-m runners with an AUC of 80.81%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: