Key result
Initial surgery for retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma is linked to ~115-month longer median overall survival.
Why the study?
Retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma has a high recurrence risk without established treatments more effective than surgery, leaving the optimal number of surgeries unclear.
Does repeated surgery improve overall survival in patients with recurrent retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma?
Cohort (n=118)
No
Does repeated surgery improve overall survival in patients with recurrent retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma?
Absolute Event Rate: 147% vs 32%
p-value: p=<0.001
First and second surgeries significantly improve overall survival in recurrent retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma, but the benefit diminishes by the third recurrence, particularly in high-grade tumors.
May support repeat resection for first or second recurrence; leaves open benefit and selection criteria for subsequent surgeries.
Retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma is associated with a high risk of recurrence; however, treatment strategies that are more effective than surgery remain to be established. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of surgeries that would be effective for patients with recurrent disease. Furthermore, the improvement in prognosis was evaluated according to the malignancy level. The effect of each type of surgery on the prognosis of 118 patients with retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma treated at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between 1997 and 2022 was investigated. Among the 118 patients, 103 underwent initial surgery, while 54 and 30 patients underwent second and third surgeries, respectively. The overall and disease-free survival rates of each group were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance in univariate analysis. 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) was used to assess malignancy. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of ≥ 4 and < 4 were classified as high and low malignancy, respectively. The first and second surgeries resulted in a significant improvement in the overall survival rate, regardless of the malignancy level ( p < 0.001); however, no significant improvement in prognosis was observed after the third surgery ( p = 0.077). Low-grade malignancies are associated with a better postoperative prognosis, even in cases of recurrence. In contrast, high-grade malignancies exhibit a reduction in surgical efficacy. This study highlights the importance of considering the tumor malignancy level and the patient's overall condition when deciding whether to perform repeated surgical interventions. Surgical treatment can prolong overall survival, even in patients with recurrence; however, it is advisable to assess malignancy levels when determining the suitability of surgery beyond the second recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n=118). Surgery vs. Non-surgery was evaluated on Overall survival from initial presentation (OS-0) (p=<0.001). First and second surgeries significantly improved median overall survival (147 vs 32 months for first surgery, p < 0.001) in patients with retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: