Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reactions of the tetrairidium anion [Ir 4 (CO) 11 (Ph)] – ( 1 ) with [Cu(NCMe) 4 ][BF 4 ] and Ag[NO 3 ] have yielded the new iridium–copper and iridium–silver complexes Ir 4 (CO) 11 (μ-η 1 -Ph)[μ 3 -Cu(NCMe)] ( 2 ) and [Et 4 N][{Ir 4 (CO) 11 Ph} 2 (μ 4 -Ag)] ( 3 ), respectively. Compound 2 consists of a tetrahedral Ir 4 cluster with a Cu(NCMe) group bridging one of the Ir 3 triangular faces of the cluster and a semibridging η 1 -phenyl ligand that is σ–π-coordinated as a bridge across one of the Ir–Cu bonds. The complex anion of 3 contains two Ir 4 (CO) 11 Ph anions linked by a single quadruply bridging silver atom that has adopted a bow-tie geometry between the four iridium atoms. It contains two terminally coordinated σ-phenyl ligands. Compound 3 reacts with a second equivalent of Ag[NO 3 ] to yield the uncharged complex [Ir 4 (CO) 11 ] 2 (μ 4 -Ag)(μ-Ag)(μ 3 -Ph)(μ-Ph) ( 4 ), which contains two Ir 4 (CO) 11 clusters linked by a quadruply bridging silver atom and one triply bridging Ph ligand. The second Ag atom in 4 is an edge bridge on one of the Ir 4 clusters, and the second Ph ligand bridges an Ir–Ag bond to it. When it is dissolved in NCMe, compound 4 is split in two and adds 1 equiv of NCMe to the Ag atom in each half to form the compound Ir 4 (CO) 11 (η 1 -Ph)[μ 3 -Ag(NCMe)] ( 5; 73% yield). Unlike 2, the phenyl ligand in 5 is terminally coordinated. The NCMe ligand is coordinated to the Ag atom. When 4 was treated with PPh 3, the complex Ir 4 (CO) 11 (μ-η 1 -Ph)[μ 3 -Ag(PPh 3 )] ( 6 ) was obtained in 87% yield. The cluster of 6 is structurally similar to that of 5 except that the phenyl ligand has adopted a semibridging coordination to the silver atom, similar to that found between the phenyl ligand and the copper atom in 2 . All of the new products were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. The bonding of the bridging phenyl ligands to the clusters in 2 and 4 was analyzed by DFT computational methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: