Two H∞ loop-shaping control schemes for the buck converter are presented and compared to the existing linear quadratic scheme. The first control scheme is the H∞ loop-shaping controller, and the second scheme is the current-assisted H∞ loop-shaping. The evaluation of the proposed controllers is performed in terms of robust stability, control circuit complexity and robust performance of the converter. The powerful tool of μ-analysis is applied to examine the robust features of the buck converter, which employs any of the control schemes. It is shown that the current-assisted H∞ loop-shaping control scheme exhibits better performance than the other two control schemes. This conclusion is verified by simulated and experimental results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ioannidis et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: