Key result
Pulsed field ablation significantly increased GDF-15 levels at 24 hours, with no significant difference in absolute levels compared to radiofrequency catheter ablation.
Why the study?
GDF-15 levels are affected by conditions including RFCA, but their dynamics following pulsed field ablation (PFA) had not been described.
Does pulsed field ablation affect GDF-15 levels differently than radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=100)
No
Does pulsed field ablation affect GDF-15 levels differently than radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Pulsed field ablation induces a significant early increase in GDF-15 levels, reflecting acute tissue injury, with a greater 24-hour area under the curve compared to radiofrequency ablation.
Introduction GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15) is a protein from the transforming growth factor β (TGF- β ) cytokine family. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), it is a potent marker of bleeding adverse events in anticoagulated patients and a predictor of overall mortality. However, its level is affected by various conditions, including radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The study aimed to describe the dynamics of GDF-15 following a novel AF treatment approach, pulsed field ablation (PFA). Methods This prospective observational study enrolled 50 patients [median (IQR) age 63 (53; 71) years, 62% males] undergoing PFA and compared them with 50 patients [65 (57; 69) years, 64% males] post-RFCA. Results In the PFA group, 30 (60%) patients had paroxysmal AF, compared with 20 (40%) patients in the RFCA group. The median (IQR) GDF-15 level at baseline was 943 (733; 1,148) ng/L. The median value recorded 24 h after PFA was 1,363 (901; 1,867) ng/L. No significant difference in values was observed between patients treated with RFCA and those treated with PFA. However, when comparing GDF-15 values in paroxysmal AF separately, significantly higher post-procedural GDF-15 levels (immediately post-ablation and in 24 h after procedure) were observed after PFA than RFCA: 963 (672; 1,266) vs. 630 (506; 804) ng/L with p < 0.001 and 1,363 (901; 1,960) vs. 843 (710; 1,195) ng/L, p < 0.01, respectively. No correlation was found between GDF-15 levels and procedural data. Conclusion GDF-15 levels are significantly affected by catheter ablation of AF, regardless of the ablation technology used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steklá et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=100). Pulsed field ablation vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was evaluated on Absolute GDF-15 levels. Pulsed field ablation significantly increased GDF-15 levels at 24 hours, with no significant difference in absolute levels compared to radiofrequency catheter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: