Experimental and clinical analysis of the use of asymmetric vs symmetric polyethylene inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE: This study compared the effects of symmetric and asymmetric designs for mobile bearing polyethylene insert for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), both clinically and biomechanically through experimental cadaver tests. METHODS: 303 patients implanted with a mobile bearing TKA were retrospectively analyzed up to 2-year follow-up with relative scores. The same femoral and tibial components were used for all the patients; 151 patients received a Symmetric Design (SD) insert and 152 an Asymmetric Design (AD). A biomechanical experimental test was performed to improve the comprehension of the clinical results, analyzing passive squat on 5 cadaveric knee specimens: internal-external rotations of femur and tibial insert respect to the tibia tray were analyzed in native and implanted configurations (with both symmetrical and asymmetrical inserts for each specimen). RESULTS: After surgery, patients' average flexion improved from 105° (with preoperative extension deficit of 5°), to 115° (SD-group) and 120° (AD-group) at the 2-year follow-up. There was no postoperative extension deficit. AD-group presented better ability to perform certain routines and wasn't affected by any pain, while antero-lateral pain was reported in some SD-group patients. The experimental tests returned no statistically relevant difference in tibio-femoral flexion-extension and internal-external rotations among all the three configurations tested; a statistically significant difference is found for insert-tray internal-external rotations between SD and AD configurations; in details, the AD insert showed insert-tray angles comparable to the ones found for femoral component-tibial tray, while the SD insert returned lower angular values. CONCLUSION: Clinically and biomechanically, an asymmetric mobile bearing insert could represent a valid alternative to symmetric mobile bearing insert. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Case-control study Retrospective comparative study.