Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rates of solvolysis of 1-aryl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl tosylates were determined in 80% aqueous ethanol for a series of substituents. The Brown ρ+σ+ treatment fails to give a simple linear plot, but all the p-π-donors deviate upward from the meta-correlation line. On the other hand, the Yukawa–Tsuno LArSR Eq. gives a linear correlation over the whole range of substituents, log(k⁄k0)=−6.287(σ°+1.388ΔσR+), with excellent precision. Strong destabilization of the carbocation intermediate by α-CF3 appears to be reflected only in the extremely high r value, but not in the ρ value of the substituent effect. This conflicts seriously with the conclusion in the literature given for this reaction based on a simple Brown σ+ treatment. This reaction, having an extremely high resonance demand r=1.4, should be far beyond the scope of the simple Brown σ+ analysis. Varying resonance demand should be a basic requirement for adequately describing the substituent effect regarding conjugative carbocation reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murata et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: