Key result
NEA immunization with GM-CSF adjuvant elicits strong immunity and protects chickens against virulent IBDV.
Why the study?
Medium-virulence infectious bursal disease vaccines can damage the bursa of Fabricius and cause immunosuppression, making safe and effective vaccines essential.
Does NEA protein vaccine with adjuvants improve immune response and protection against IBDV in specific-pathogen-free chickens?
Does NEA protein vaccine with adjuvants improve immune response and protection against IBDV in specific-pathogen-free chickens?
A recombinant VP2 neutralizing epitope antigen (NEA) with GM-CSF adjuvant is a promising, safe, and effective vaccine candidate against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens.
Epitope confirmation advances rational IBDV vaccine design; leaves open protective efficacy in vivo.
Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is one of the most economically important infectious diseases. Currently, vaccination is the most effective method to prevent IBD. Medium-virulence vaccines can damage the bursa of Fabricius and result in immunosuppression. Therefore, it is essential to develop a safe and effective vaccine against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). In this study, the five neutralizing epitopes of the IBDV VP2 protein were confirmed by neutralizing single chain variable fragment antibodies. Then, the neutralizing epitopes antigen (NEA) protein was constructed with five neutralizing epitopes and expressed by pET-27b. Furthermore, the immune effect and protective immunity of the NEA protein with the following adjuvants were evaluated in specific-pathogen-free chickens: oil emulsion adjuvant (OEA), double emulsion adjuvant (DEA), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) adjuvant and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). The experimental results demonstrated that chickens immunized with NEA vaccines elicited stronger humoral and/or cellular immune responses and inflammatory responses than those in the NEA protein group. Chickens were protected in OEA, CFA and GM-CSF adjuvant groups, which were challenged with virulent IBDV BC6/85. Furthermore, IBDV RNA was not measured, and there appeared to be little apoptosis in the bursa of Fabricius based on TUNEL histology and the expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in the OEA, CFA and GM-CSF adjuvant groups. Based on the experimental results, the advantages and disadvantages of adjuvants and industrial production methods, GM-CSF was found to be the optimal adjuvant. Therefore, NEA with GM-CSF adjuvant is a promising vaccine candidate against IBDV, and it provides a framework for developing other vaccines against infectious viral diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2021) studied Infectious bursal disease (IBD). Neutralizing epitopes antigen (NEA) protein with adjuvants (OEA, DEA, GM-CSF, CFA) vs. NEA protein alone was evaluated on Immune responses and protection against virulent IBDV BC6/85 challenge. Immunization with the neutralizing epitopes antigen (NEA) and GM-CSF adjuvant elicited strong immune responses and protected specific-pathogen-free chickens against virulent IBDV challenge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: