Key result
Frailty is linked to a ~3-fold higher in-hospital mortality after PCI in older adults.
Why the study?
With a growing elderly population undergoing PCI, frailty is common and may affect outcomes, prompting a comprehensive evaluation of its impact in patients aged ≥75 years.
Does frailty increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years undergoing PCI?
Systematic Review (n=2,038,546)
Does frailty increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years undergoing PCI?
Relative Risk: 3.16 (95% CI 1.28–7.78)
In patients aged ≥75 years undergoing PCI, frailty significantly increases the risk of in-hospital and all-cause mortality, bleeding, and stroke, highlighting the need for perioperative risk stratification.
Frailty assessment should inform PCI risk stratification in patients ≥75 years; extends meta-analytic confirmation of its prognostic role.
Purpose The global aging population has led to a growing number of elderly patients aged ≥75 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome in this population, related to decreased physiological reserve and reduced ability to cope with stress, and it may significantly affect surgical outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of frailty on major clinical outcomes (such as in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, bleeding, and stroke) in patients aged ≥75 years after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2025. We included retrospective or prospective cohort studies reporting the relationship between frailty (assessed by any validated tool) and prognosis in elderly patients aged ≥75 years undergoing PCI. Data extraction covered study characteristics, population, age, CAD type, frailty assessment, and outcomes. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale assessed bias risk. A fixed-effect model was used if I 2 < 50%; otherwise a random-effects model was used. Subgroup, meta-regression analysis and sensitivity analyses explored heterogeneity sources. Funnel plots assessed publication bias. The GRADE system rated evidence quality for each outcome. Results This systematic review included a total of 18 cohort studies, comprising 11 retrospective and 7 prospective studies, involving 2,038,546 patients. Our pooled analysis demonstrated that, compared with their non-frail counterparts, frail patients aged ≥75 years had a significantly higher risk of mortality and adverse outcomes following PCI. Specifically, frailty was closely associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death (RR = 3.16, 95% CI: 1.28–7.78) and all-cause death (RR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.78–3.56). Furthermore, frailty significantly increased the incidence of complications, including the risk of bleeding (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.54–3.31) and stroke (RR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.86–1.94). The GRADE evidence certainty was low across all outcomes. Conclusion In patients aged ≥75 years undergoing PCI, frailty is associated with increased risks of in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, bleeding, and stroke. These findings support perioperative risk stratification, shared decision-making, and individualized management, though low GRADE evidence and uncertainty warrant caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,038,546). Frailty vs. Non-frail was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (RR 3.16, 95% CI 1.28-7.78). In patients aged ≥75 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, frailty significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 3.16) compared to non-frail patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: