The Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) has recently developed a per-parcel classification procedure which integrates remotely sensed imagery with digital cartography. The aim of the work reported here was to compare the per-parcel approach with a conventional per-pixel classification through examination of maximum likelihood class probabilities. An Airborne Thematic Mapper (ATM) image with 1.25 m spatial resolution was used as a source of training data. The ATM image was spatially degraded to 10 m resolution to form the remotely sensed input and the study area was subdivided into land parcels by manual digitizing. The per-parcel approach extracted raster data from a core area described by a shrunken version of a land parcel, thus eliminating mixed boundary pixels. Boundary pixels were shown to be more variable than the core pixels and their removal improved classification confidence. The per-parcel approach calculated the mean spectral response of the extracted core pixels. This was shown to remove within-parcel variation and improve classification confidence in comparison to per-pixel class allocations. A parcel-based representation was shown to be most appropriate for mapping agricultural land cover in comparison to semi-natural areas, because agricultural landscapes have an inherent parcel structure. When land cover is heterogeneous, as in many semi-natural areas, a per-pixel classification would appear to be more appropriate. A hybrid classifier, which could switch between per-parcel and per-pixel mapping, was suggested as a powerful land cover mapping tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: