Key result
Only age and gender were reported to influence survival beyond two years in a majority of the 43 included studies, indicating insufficient literature to accurately estimate 2-year life expectancy after geriatric hip fracture.
Why the study?
Choosing between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty requires estimating life expectancy because benefits do not diverge until the second postoperative year, prompting a review to see if literature supports estimating survival beyond two years.
What patient variables affect survival beyond two years in geriatric patients treated surgically for isolated hip fracture?
Systematic Review (n=200,000)
What patient variables affect survival beyond two years in geriatric patients treated surgically for isolated hip fracture?
Current literature lacks sufficient data to accurately predict 2-year life expectancy in geriatric hip fracture patients, which is necessary for choosing between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.
BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients are typically treated with either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The choice between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty requires a good estimate of the patient's life expectancy, as the recent HEALTH trial suggests that the benefits of the two operations do not diverge, if at all, until the second year post-operatively. A systematic review was this performed to determine if there sufficient information in the medical literature to estimate a patient's life expectancy beyond two years and to identify those patient variables affecting survival of that duration. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried for articles reporting survival data for at least two years post-operatively for at least 100 patients, age 65 or greater, treated surgically for an isolated hip fracture. A final set of 43 papers was created. The methods section of all selected papers was then reviewed to determine which variables were collected in the studies and the results section was reviewed to note whether an effect was reported for all collected variables. RESULTS: There were 43 eligible studies with 25 unique variables identified. Only age, gender, comorbidities, the presence of dementia and fracture type were collected in a majority of studies, and within that, only age and gender were reported in a majority of the results. Most (15/ 25) variables were reported in 5 or fewer of the studies. DISCUSSION: There are important deficiencies in the literature precluding the evidence-based estimation of 2 year life expectancy. Because the ostensible advantages of total hip arthroplasty are reaped only by those who survive two years or more, there is a need for additional data collection, analysis and reporting regarding survival after geriatric hip fracture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Geriatric hip fracture (n=200,000). Preoperative patient variables (e.g., age, gender, comorbidities) was evaluated on Reporting of variables affecting survival beyond two years. Only age and gender were reported to influence survival beyond two years in a majority of the 43 included studies, indicating insufficient literature to accurately estimate 2-year life expectancy after geriatric hip fracture.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: