Key result
Internal mammary artery grafts experience a 10% rate of late arterial closure, potentially driven by chronic competition from moderate native coronary lesions.
Why the study?
Does competitive flow from moderate coronary lesions cause late occlusion of internal mammary artery grafts in patients undergoing CABG?
Does competitive flow from moderate coronary lesions cause late occlusion of internal mammary artery grafts in patients undergoing CABG?
When considering IMA grafts for moderate coronary lesions, functional investigations like fractional flow reserve should be used to assess the risk of competitive flow and subsequent graft occlusion.
May caution IMA grafting to moderate lesions; leaves open whether FFR guidance improves long-term patency.
The outcome of patient undergoing CABG is largely dependant on the long-term patency of the conduit used. Internal mammary artery (IMA) is considered whenever possible due to its improved long-term functionality over saphenous vein graft. However, a 10% rate of late arterial closure is described without well-known predictors. Chronic competition induced by a moderate coronary lesion on the bypassed native vessel is thought to be a major factor of arterial graft shrinkage even if conflicting data are reported in the available literature. Therefore, the decision to use an IMA to bypass a moderate native coronary lesion should be carefully weighted. When angiography is doubtful, more accurate functional investigations should be considered. Among them, pressure-derived fractional flow reserve could give an immediate answer of whether an intermediate lesion should be bypassed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2004) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease requiring CABG. Internal mammary artery grafting vs. Saphenous vein graft was evaluated on Late arterial closure. Internal mammary artery grafts experience a 10% rate of late arterial closure, potentially driven by chronic competition from moderate native coronary lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: