Key result
Pump-Assisted Direct CABG (PAD-CAB) was associated with a hospital mortality rate of 0.65% and low rates of major adverse events, which the author notes are equivalent or superior to STS registry outcomes.
Why the study?
Does Pump-Assisted Direct CABG (PAD-CAB) without aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest result in safe and effective outcomes compared to STS registry benchmarks in patients undergoing CABG?
Observational (n=317)
No
Does Pump-Assisted Direct CABG (PAD-CAB) without aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest result in safe and effective outcomes compared to STS registry benchmarks in patients undergoing CABG?
PAD-CAB is a safe and effective surgical revascularization technique that avoids aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest, yielding low hospital mortality and major adverse event rates.
Background: The techniques utilized to accomplish Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) include the traditional use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest to totally Off- Pump (i.e. OP-CAB) without CPB. The purpose of this report is to describe a hybrid approach-Pump-Assisted Direct CABG (PAD-CAB)-- with the aid of CPB without aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest. Methods: Between November 2003 and December 2016, 317 PAD-CAB procedures were performed by the author/surgeon. The PAD-CAB procedures were achieved with standard CPB via sternotomy under normothermic conditions with the mean arterial pressures (MAP) kept between 60 and 80 mmHg. Outcome measures included hospital mortality and specific major adverse events (MAE) benchmarked against the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. The number of bypass grafts, status of the case, specific patient factors, and postoperative length of stay (LOS) were also assessed. Results: There were 238 male (75%) and 79 (25%) female patients. The mean age was 67 years (range: 38 to 92 years). The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 50% (range: 0 to 75%) with 66 cases (21%) having an EF<40%. Two hundred seventy-seven cases (87.4%) were non-emergent with forty cases (12.6%) classified as emergent/salvage. The average of number of bypass grafts was 3.24 (range: 1 to 5). The postoperative LOS averaged 7.5 days with a median of 6 days. There were two hospital deaths (0.65%). Major adverse events were: 1 deep SWI (0.32%), 3 CVAs (0.95%), and 5 POBs (1.58%). Conclusions: PAD-CAB is a safe and effective operation with outcomes that are equivalent or superior to the outcomes reported in the STS registry for CABG. The PAD-CAB technique takes advantage of the circulatory stability achieved with CPB assistance and eliminates the potential risks associated with aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuels et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Coronary Artery Disease requiring CABG (n=317). Pump-Assisted Direct CABG (PAD-CAB) vs. STS database benchmarks was evaluated on Hospital mortality. Pump-Assisted Direct CABG (PAD-CAB) was associated with a hospital mortality rate of 0.65% and low rates of major adverse events, which the author notes are equivalent or superior to STS registry outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: